Friday
Class Leaders' Breakout Sessions
- Friday’s
three Breakout Sessions centered upon Best Practices, another discussion
of AOG communications, and an Open Discussion. Jack Miller ’54 led the Best Practices
session, and a spirited discussion ensued.
This session proved to be a valuable one because it resulted in
several specific, meaningful “best practices” coming to the surface during
the course of the discussion. As
two examples of these best practices, Dutch Hostler ’68 discussed the
“virtual” Marchback that his class began several
years ago and that has resulted in tens of thousands of dollars of
donations, not to mention a great deal of fun by all those participating,
and the moderator sharing with the audience his class’ practice of
arranging for cadets to brief his class on cadet life during reunions so
that his classmates can stay abreast of how the Corps has, and hasn’t,
changed.
- MG Alan
Salisbury ’58 led the next Breakout Session, a discussion of the ways in
which the AOG is attempting to improve its communications, marketing, and
outreach. Whereas the discussion
led by Tom Mulyca the previous day focused on the technological
capabilities of the AOG’s communications plan, this session focused on the
strategic goals the AOG has for that plan and how it hopes to achieve
those goals. During this session,
General Salisbury led the audience through the process the Communications
Committee used to develop these goals, and he provided his listeners with
an update of the progress the AOG is making toward meeting those
goals. He focused his remarks on
the AOG’s goal of “marketing” and “branding” itself and how this process will help the AOG
reach out to more graduates, as well as other people who may be able to
help the AOG reach its goal of becoming the premier alumni association in
America.
- The Class
Leader Breakout Sessions concluded with an Open Discussion forum led by
Dan Evans ’64. Because of the
lengthy discussion engendered by the previous two sessions, time was again
at a premium, but several specific points did arise during this
discussion. LTG Stroup ’62 stated
that he was considering having a separate session for first-time attendees
during next year’s Leaders’ Conference.
The purpose of this separate session would be for these individuals
to receive briefings on the kind of important but basic information that
would greatly benefit them but that would not similarly benefit those who
have attended many Leaders’ Conferences.
Three other comments dealt with effectively managing the content of
AOG communications, incorporating bus schedules into the conference
handouts, and dividing a portion of next year’s Breakout Sessions into
groups based very generally on seniority.
These groups, perhaps consisting of senior classes, mid-level
classes, and junior classes, could meet together to discuss issues
particularly germane to themselves.